9 Comments
User's avatar
Aurem's avatar

Exulansic noticed a troubling aspect of the Skrmetti ruling that could be very bad for women. She explains that as part of this recent talk for WoLF: https://youtu.be/uVo4RRGhSts

Cheyenne's avatar

Having been a medical social worker in pediatric endocrinology, i will add that the primary justification for puberty blockers in precocious puberty is to avoid imagined future negative psychological impacts of…not going through puberty at the same time as your peers. 😐

Nina Paley's avatar

That certainly is ironic.

Diane Perry's avatar

Bostock was a terrible decision... No grieving family needs to tiptoe around that dude's fetish while trying to bury Grandma.

Dan T.'s avatar

This episode doesn’t seem to have made it to the Apple Podcasts feed.

Courtney's avatar

I was so confused at first thinking this episode was discussing a lawsuit involving Nina’s expensive medication treatment Skyrizi.

Syl's avatar

I was hoping you’d have Judge TERF on to discuss Skrmetti! 😊

Also, I’d like to give a shout-out to “In Sadness, I Dissent,” Cori’s Suno tribute to Justice Sotomayor’s dissent: https://suno.com/s/X92r5Li75zv6SCrI

MGS's avatar

Best episode ever! Really helpful analysis.